A connection that has taken place only through screens, written words, photos — without ever a real physical meeting. Or perhaps one seen from afar — in a public setting, in a professional environment — without ever a real conversation. The love binding directed at a person never met in person is one of the borderline cases of esoteric doctrine — the one in which the distance between image and real person is at its greatest.
This article analyses this scenario honestly — its real limits, its limited possibilities, and what the love binding can and cannot find.
The field of those who have never met
As discussed in the article sought bond vs bond already lived, the field between two people who have never met is almost devoid of mutual correspondences. The correspondences the love binding seeks — traces deposited by a real meeting, resonances created by mutual physical presence — do not exist, or exist only minimally.
As discussed in the article mental image vs real person in a binding, without a real meeting what one has is an image — built from observation at a distance, from photos, from social presence. This image is in one's own field — not in the other's field.
The structural limit of this scenario
The love binding operates on the real correspondences in the field of both people. If the person one wishes to draw closer has never had an opening towards the person who requested the love binding — does not know who they are, has never interacted, carries no trace of the other's presence — the love binding finds no correspondences to rest on.
This is the most structural limit that exists in the love binding — more than geographical distance, more than a long separation, more than a conflictual field. The absence of shared history is the absence of the field material on which the love binding operates.
When some correspondences exist even without a meeting
There are cases in which, even without a physical meeting, some real correspondences have been created: a deep conversation held online, an interaction in a digital context that had a quality of authentic openness, a communication that left traces in both fields.
Even in these limited cases, the correspondences are less dense than those created by a physical meeting — but they exist. The love binding can find something to work on — even if the field is less rich.
What is most useful to do before the love binding in this scenario
As discussed in the article sought bond vs bond already lived, the field is enriched through real history — it cannot be replaced by the love binding. In a scenario with no real meeting, building occasions for authentic interaction — which create real correspondences in the other's field — is a preliminary step that precedes the love binding and does not replace it.
FAQ: frequently asked questions on the love binding for a person never met
We have never met but I feel a very strong connection — does the love binding make sense?
As analysed in this article, the connection you feel is in your own field — not necessarily in the other's field. Without real mutual correspondences, the love binding has little material. A real meeting that produces correspondences is the most useful step before any consideration of the love binding.
We had a very intense online conversation — does it count as history?
Partially. A deep online conversation leaves some traces in the field — but less dense than those created by a physical meeting. The love binding has something to rest on — less than it would have with a fuller history, but not nothing.
